Skip to content
Auren StudioPresentation & Visual Communication Design

Case 04 / Bilingual cross-border company profile / 2026

RIVET/FORM

RIVET/FORM case-study cover
Audience
Overseas procurement, engineering and distribution teams
Format
HTML → PDF presentation system
Scale
13 slides
System direction
Assembly Field

A buyer can move forward only when capability, proof state and exceptions are visible.

01 / Buyer fit

Start with the buyer's specification fields—not a generic company history.

The opening decision page helps procurement and engineering teams identify fit, exceptions and evidence requirements before investing time in a broad introduction.

  • Buyer fields are informed by public supplier-scouting guidance.
  • No real buyer, distributor or customer relationship is implied.
  • Fit statements describe a fictional concept system.
RIVET/FORM selected presentation page

02 / Architecture & capability

Connect product families to a capability boundary that can be compared.

Platform architecture and the capability matrix show what belongs to the system, what requires confirmation and which fields must remain open until specifications are supplied.

  • Dimensions, load, material, MOQ and lead-time values are synthetic.
  • Tables and bilingual labels remain native presentation content.
  • No facility, certification or production capacity is presented as verified.
RIVET/FORM selected presentation page 1
RIVET/FORM selected presentation page 2

03 / Proof & next step

Ask for specifications first, then advance toward sample review.

The evidence page and close keep verified, pending and unknown states visible. The proposed next step is a specification-led review—not an empty request for quotation.

  • Quality and export fields are evidence requirements, not completed claims.
  • Document categories require destination-specific confirmation.
  • No shipment, test result, certification or buyer approval is claimed.
RIVET/FORM selected presentation page 1
RIVET/FORM selected presentation page 2

Source and capability-claim boundary.

  • 01
    NIST MEP material informs supplier-scouting fields; it does not validate RIVET/FORM.
  • 02
    Trade.gov material informs export-document categories; destination requirements still need confirmation.
  • 03
    Company, facility, product, capacity, MOQ, lead time and commercial terms are synthetic or unknown.
  • 04
    No client-confidential material, factory evidence, certification, shipment or buyer relationship is used.

One case. One clear decision.